BacklinkGPT
vs
Mailshake

At a glance

BacklinkGPT vs Mailshake

Mailshake is a cold-email sequencer you set up and drive. BacklinkGPT is different: an AI agent that hunts backlinks for your domain every night — and you approve every send.

See BacklinkGPT pricingBrowse comparisons
Fair comparisonSources includedUpdated regularly
Choose BacklinkGPT if
  • You want an agent, not another sequencer: it scans SERPs nightly, judges every page with a written rationale, finds the right contact, and drafts the pitch.
  • You want autonomy with a safety rail: nothing sends without your approval, sends stay inside your window, and senders warm up automatically.
  • You want honest capacity pricing: plans sell senders + daily agent pace; credits (2,000 / 6,000 / 20,000) are a fair-use meter — not seat-based outbound pricing.
Choose Mailshake if
  • You mainly need cold email sequences for sales/outreach beyond link building.
  • You want warm-up + verification and A/B testing built into the outbound tool.
  • You don’t need backlink placement verification or link monitoring inside the product.

TL;DR

The short version. Use the sections below if you need details.

  • Mailshake is an outbound sequencing tool: you build the lists and run the campaigns. BacklinkGPT is an autonomous agent working your domain — nightly hunts, judged prospects, drafts waiting for your approval.
  • Mailshake cost scales with seats (and tiered caps). BacklinkGPT sells capacity — senders + daily agent pace — with credits (2,000 / 6,000 / 20,000) as a fair-use meter.

Pricing snapshot

Mailshake pricing, without the guesswork

This is the public pricing page we used for the comparison. Here are the numbers worth paying attention to.

Official pricing page
July 22, 2026
Mailshake pricing page showing Starter, Email Outreach, and Sales Engagement plans

What you need to know

  • Mailshake currently lists $29, $49, and $99 monthly plans, with lower prices for annual billing.
  • The product prices email and sales-engagement capacity, not backlink prospecting or verified placement outcomes.
  • Its FAQ says payment is collected up front and no free trial is offered.
Worth keeping in mind

The capture verifies Mailshake’s published plan structure. It does not include the separate cost and labor of sourcing, qualifying, and monitoring backlink prospects.

See the live page

https://mailshake.com/pricing/View pricing

Workflow: how teams use it

This is where the biggest day-to-day difference appears—not just in the feature list.

BacklinkGPT workflow

  1. 1

    Enter your domain

    The agent reads your site, picks target pages, seeds keyword angles, and judges its first prospects in minutes.

  2. 2

    It hunts every night

    Nightly SERP scans, competitor backlink mining, and contact discovery keep the pipeline stocked — on your timezone, within your plan.

  3. 3

    You approve, it lands

    Drafts wait in your review queue; approved sends go out in your send window, replies get triaged, and live links are tracked.

Mailshake workflow

  1. 1

    List + campaign setup

    Import/organize leads and build outbound sequences around sales-style outcomes.

  2. 2

    Multi-touch sequence execution

    Run cold email campaigns with warm-up and reply tracking as primary optimization signals.

  3. 3

    Reply/engagement follow-up

    Prioritize opens, clicks, and responses before moving to later-stage outreach.

  4. 4

    Additional placement tracking

    Validate placement outcomes with separate tooling when needed.

Pricing and billing semantics

For link building, the practical question is simple: are you paying for seats, or for workload (prospects + inboxes)?

Which is the better fit?

BacklinkGPTBacklinkGPT

BACKLINK-FIRST

Usage semantics

MailshakeMailshake

OUTBOUND

Per-user pricing

Published base pricing

The part you can validate publicly.

BacklinkGPT

BacklinkGPT: Starter $149/mo, Growth $399/mo, Scale $999/mo

Mailshake

$29–$99 per user per month (plus add-ons)

Primary cost driver

The lever that makes your bill go up as you scale.

BacklinkGPT

Capacity: senders + daily agent pace (credits are fair-use fuel)

Mailshake

Seat count (users) and tier

Included inboxes

How many sending accounts you get without paying more.

BacklinkGPT

1 / 3 / 6 connected senders (by plan)

Mailshake

Varies by tier and seat (verify inbox-per-user limits)

Send capacity (default safeguards)

A practical “how much can we send” estimate.

BacklinkGPT

≈900 email attempts/month per inbox (30/day; follow-ups included)

Mailshake

Guidance-led (Mailshake commonly recommends ~100/day); Starter plan is capped (e.g., 1,500 sends/month)

Overage model

What happens when you need more.

BacklinkGPT

Credits: $0.03
Inbox: $19/month

Mailshake

Add seats and/or upgrade tier

Trial and refunds

Risk if it’s not a fit.

BacklinkGPT

7-day free trial

Mailshake

No free trial; no refunds

Which is the better fit?

BacklinkGPTBacklinkGPT

BACKLINK-FIRST

Usage semantics
MailshakeMailshake

OUTBOUND

Per-user pricing

Published base pricing

The part you can validate publicly.

BacklinkGPT: Starter $149/mo, Growth $399/mo, Scale $999/mo
$29–$99 per user per month (plus add-ons)

Primary cost driver

The lever that makes your bill go up as you scale.

Capacity: senders + daily agent pace (credits are fair-use fuel)
Seat count (users) and tier

Included inboxes

How many sending accounts you get without paying more.

1 / 3 / 6 connected senders (by plan)
Varies by tier and seat (verify inbox-per-user limits)

Send capacity (default safeguards)

A practical “how much can we send” estimate.

≈900 email attempts/month per inbox (30/day; follow-ups included)
Guidance-led (Mailshake commonly recommends ~100/day); Starter plan is capped (e.g., 1,500 sends/month)

Overage model

What happens when you need more.

Credits: $0.03
Inbox: $19/month
Add seats and/or upgrade tier

Trial and refunds

Risk if it’s not a fit.

7-day free trial
No free trial; no refunds

Deep feature comparison

If your goal is links, these differences matter more than sequence templates.

Which is the better fit?

BacklinkGPTBacklinkGPT

PIPELINE

Track to links

MailshakeMailshake

SEQUENCES

Sends + replies

Primary tracking unit

What the UI naturally pushes you to optimize.

BacklinkGPT

Links shipped + kept

Mailshake

Sends, opens, replies

Backlink verification/monitoring

Does it check that links actually go live and stay live?

BacklinkGPT

Mailshake

Deliverability safeguards

What prevents accidental oversending.

BacklinkGPT

Enforced: 30 email attempts/day per inbox (≈900/month; follow-ups included)

Mailshake

Warm-up + verification included; guidance-led daily caps (often ~100/day) + plan constraints

A/B testing

Split-testing focus.

BacklinkGPT

Not the core focus

Mailshake

Which is the better fit?

BacklinkGPTBacklinkGPT

PIPELINE

Track to links
MailshakeMailshake

SEQUENCES

Sends + replies

Primary tracking unit

What the UI naturally pushes you to optimize.

Links shipped + kept
Sends, opens, replies

Backlink verification/monitoring

Does it check that links actually go live and stay live?

Deliverability safeguards

What prevents accidental oversending.

Enforced: 30 email attempts/day per inbox (≈900/month; follow-ups included)
Warm-up + verification included; guidance-led daily caps (often ~100/day) + plan constraints

A/B testing

Split-testing focus.

Not the core focus

Pricing details that affect the real cost

Compare the limits, add-ons, and scaling rules—not only the starting price.

BacklinkGPT

Model

subscription = capacity (senders + daily agent pace); credits are a fair-use meter

Included

  • 2,000 / 6,000 / 20,000 prospect credits (fair-use, by plan)
  • 1 / 3 / 6 connected senders included
  • 7-day trial — the agent shows its work before you pay

Usage & add-ons

  • Extra credits: $0.03 (top-up pack or opt-in overage)
  • Extra sender: $19/month

Notes

  • One marginal price for credits everywhere — no overage arbitrage, no surprise bills.
  • Upgrades buy real throughput: more senders and a faster daily pace, not just bigger numbers.

Mailshake

Model

seat-based outreach (per user)

Included

  • Seat-based base feature access
  • Outbound templates and sequencing

Usage & add-ons

  • More seats
  • Tier upgrades

Notes

  • Trial/refund details vary by channel and offer.
  • Mailshake is strongest when replies and sequence management are the target KPI.

A practical switching plan

Move one workflow at a time, keep the outreach history you need, and test sender setup before scaling.

Steps

  1. 1

    Map your current outreach entry points

    Decide which lead sources and qualification filters move into BacklinkGPT before migration.

  2. 2

    Export active lists and outreach context

    Keep history for follow-up continuity but shift copy execution into the new workflow.

  3. 3

    Pilot with one campaign + one week window

    Run a short pilot to confirm inbox caps, reply rates, and link-tracking quality.

  4. 4

    Transition reporting and handoffs

    Define ownership of prospecting, link status, and outcome proof from day one.

Checklist

  • Inboxes per seat and whether you need dedicated mailboxes per account model.
  • Whether you still need third-party prospecting/monitoring after migration.
  • Team permissions and handoff ownership for follow-up workflows.

The question that matters most: who owns link-building judgment?

Mailshake can send and manage outreach well, but it is a general sales-engagement product. Your team still needs to source suitable pages, judge link quality, choose the right person, handle negotiations, and verify the final backlink. If those are the jobs you want software to take over, comparing email-sequence features misses the main difference.

Deliverability also remains your responsibility. Mailshake provides warm-up, verification, throttling, and inbox rotation, but no sending tool can rescue weak lists, poor authentication, or irrelevant copy. Its large G2 review footprint consistently praises ease of use and fast setup; reported drawbacks include occasional bugs, integration gaps, and an interface some users find dated.

Who is behind Mailshake?

Sujan Patel and Robert Senoff founded the company in 2015. It began as ContentMarketer.io before evolving into Mailshake, a broader sales-engagement platform. That history explains why it can support link outreach without being purpose-built around backlink qualification and retention.

Questions to ask before choosing

Quick answers to the points worth checking before you choose.

Sources

Last reviewed: 2026-07-23

  • Mailshake pricing

    https://mailshake.com/pricing/
  • Mailshake pricing explained

    https://docs.mailshake.com/article/56-pricing-explained
  • Mailshake refund policy

    https://docs.mailshake.com/article/53-whats-your-refund-policy
  • About Mailshake

    Founder and company background.

    https://mailshake.com/about/
  • Mailshake founder interview

    2015 launch and ContentMarketer.io origin.

    https://www.producthood.com/magazine-article/in-conversation-with-sujan-patel-co-founder-of-mailshake-voilanorbert/
  • Mailshake reviews on G2

    Large independent review sample and recurring buyer themes.

    https://www.g2.com/products/mailshake/reviews
On this pageTL;DR
TL;DRMailshake pricing, without the guessworkWorkflow: how teams use itPricing and billing semanticsThe question that matters most: who owns link-building judgment?Who is behind Mailshake?Questions to ask before choosingSources

On this page

TL;DRMailshake pricing, without the guessworkWorkflow: how teams use itPricing and billing semanticsThe question that matters most: who owns link-building judgment?Who is behind Mailshake?Questions to ask before choosingSources

Related Comparisons

Explore other head-to-head pages in this comparison cluster.

  • Respona logo

    BacklinkGPT vs Respona

    Best for teams choosing between outsourced placements and a template-led outreach app.

  • Pitchbox logo

    BacklinkGPT vs Pitchbox

    Best for teams managing many client campaigns with strict process and visibility requirements.

  • LinkDR logo

    BacklinkGPT vs LinkDR

    Best for teams that want to buy defined placement tiers instead of operating an owned outreach pipeline.

  • BuzzStream logo

    BacklinkGPT vs BuzzStream

    Best for agencies that need durable contact history and collaborative campaign workflows.

  • Adaptify logo

    BacklinkGPT vs Adaptify

    Best for agencies that want one white-label SEO delivery stack rather than a focused backlink outreach agent.

  • Backlinker AI logo

    BacklinkGPT vs Backlinker AI

    Best for businesses that want outsourced expert-quote pitches and a stated monthly backlink guarantee.

  • Linkee logo

    BacklinkGPT vs Linkee

    Best for SEO teams that want to operate their own campaigns inside a consolidated prospecting and outreach tool.

BacklinkGPT LogoBacklinkGPT

Your AI agent for backlinks. It hunts, drafts, and waits for your go.

Content

  • The agent
  • How it works
  • Docs
  • Affiliate Program

Socials

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • TikTok
© 2026 FMD Labs GmbH
Disclaimer · Privacy · Terms
BacklinkGPT LogoBacklinkGPT
  • Agent
  • How it works
  • Pricing
App
  • BlogLink-building playbooks, teardowns & product news
  • DocsSet up your agent and learn how it works
  • CompareHow BacklinkGPT stacks up against alternatives
  • Free toolsFree authority checker & backlink opportunity scan
Home
  • Agent
  • How it works
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Start 7-day trial
BacklinkGPT LogoBacklinkGPT
  • Agent
  • How it works
  • Pricing
App
  • BlogLink-building playbooks, teardowns & product news
  • DocsSet up your agent and learn how it works
  • CompareHow BacklinkGPT stacks up against alternatives
  • Free toolsFree authority checker & backlink opportunity scan
Home
  • Agent
  • How it works
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
BacklinkGPT
vs
Mailshake

At a glance

BacklinkGPT vs Mailshake

Mailshake is a cold-email sequencer you set up and drive. BacklinkGPT is different: an AI agent that hunts backlinks for your domain every night — and you approve every send.

See BacklinkGPT pricingBrowse comparisons
Fair comparisonSources includedUpdated regularly
Choose BacklinkGPT if
  • You want an agent, not another sequencer: it scans SERPs nightly, judges every page with a written rationale, finds the right contact, and drafts the pitch.
  • You want autonomy with a safety rail: nothing sends without your approval, sends stay inside your window, and senders warm up automatically.
  • You want honest capacity pricing: plans sell senders + daily agent pace; credits (2,000 / 6,000 / 20,000) are a fair-use meter — not seat-based outbound pricing.
Choose Mailshake if
  • You mainly need cold email sequences for sales/outreach beyond link building.
  • You want warm-up + verification and A/B testing built into the outbound tool.
  • You don’t need backlink placement verification or link monitoring inside the product.

TL;DR

The short version. Use the sections below if you need details.

  • Mailshake is an outbound sequencing tool: you build the lists and run the campaigns. BacklinkGPT is an autonomous agent working your domain — nightly hunts, judged prospects, drafts waiting for your approval.
  • Mailshake cost scales with seats (and tiered caps). BacklinkGPT sells capacity — senders + daily agent pace — with credits (2,000 / 6,000 / 20,000) as a fair-use meter.

Pricing snapshot

Mailshake pricing, without the guesswork

This is the public pricing page we used for the comparison. Here are the numbers worth paying attention to.

Official pricing page
July 22, 2026
Mailshake pricing page showing Starter, Email Outreach, and Sales Engagement plans

What you need to know

  • Mailshake currently lists $29, $49, and $99 monthly plans, with lower prices for annual billing.
  • The product prices email and sales-engagement capacity, not backlink prospecting or verified placement outcomes.
  • Its FAQ says payment is collected up front and no free trial is offered.
Worth keeping in mind

The capture verifies Mailshake’s published plan structure. It does not include the separate cost and labor of sourcing, qualifying, and monitoring backlink prospects.

See the live page

https://mailshake.com/pricing/View pricing

Workflow: how teams use it

This is where the biggest day-to-day difference appears—not just in the feature list.

BacklinkGPT workflow

  1. 1

    Enter your domain

    The agent reads your site, picks target pages, seeds keyword angles, and judges its first prospects in minutes.

  2. 2

    It hunts every night

    Nightly SERP scans, competitor backlink mining, and contact discovery keep the pipeline stocked — on your timezone, within your plan.

  3. 3

    You approve, it lands

    Drafts wait in your review queue; approved sends go out in your send window, replies get triaged, and live links are tracked.

Mailshake workflow

  1. 1

    List + campaign setup

    Import/organize leads and build outbound sequences around sales-style outcomes.

  2. 2

    Multi-touch sequence execution

    Run cold email campaigns with warm-up and reply tracking as primary optimization signals.

  3. 3

    Reply/engagement follow-up

    Prioritize opens, clicks, and responses before moving to later-stage outreach.

  4. 4

    Additional placement tracking

    Validate placement outcomes with separate tooling when needed.

Pricing and billing semantics

For link building, the practical question is simple: are you paying for seats, or for workload (prospects + inboxes)?

Which is the better fit?

BacklinkGPTBacklinkGPT

BACKLINK-FIRST

Usage semantics

MailshakeMailshake

OUTBOUND

Per-user pricing

Published base pricing

The part you can validate publicly.

BacklinkGPT

BacklinkGPT: Starter $149/mo, Growth $399/mo, Scale $999/mo

Mailshake

$29–$99 per user per month (plus add-ons)

Primary cost driver

The lever that makes your bill go up as you scale.

BacklinkGPT

Capacity: senders + daily agent pace (credits are fair-use fuel)

Mailshake

Seat count (users) and tier

Included inboxes

How many sending accounts you get without paying more.

BacklinkGPT

1 / 3 / 6 connected senders (by plan)

Mailshake

Varies by tier and seat (verify inbox-per-user limits)

Send capacity (default safeguards)

A practical “how much can we send” estimate.

BacklinkGPT

≈900 email attempts/month per inbox (30/day; follow-ups included)

Mailshake

Guidance-led (Mailshake commonly recommends ~100/day); Starter plan is capped (e.g., 1,500 sends/month)

Overage model

What happens when you need more.

BacklinkGPT

Credits: $0.03
Inbox: $19/month

Mailshake

Add seats and/or upgrade tier

Trial and refunds

Risk if it’s not a fit.

BacklinkGPT

7-day free trial

Mailshake

No free trial; no refunds

Which is the better fit?

BacklinkGPTBacklinkGPT

BACKLINK-FIRST

Usage semantics
MailshakeMailshake

OUTBOUND

Per-user pricing

Published base pricing

The part you can validate publicly.

BacklinkGPT: Starter $149/mo, Growth $399/mo, Scale $999/mo
$29–$99 per user per month (plus add-ons)

Primary cost driver

The lever that makes your bill go up as you scale.

Capacity: senders + daily agent pace (credits are fair-use fuel)
Seat count (users) and tier

Included inboxes

How many sending accounts you get without paying more.

1 / 3 / 6 connected senders (by plan)
Varies by tier and seat (verify inbox-per-user limits)

Send capacity (default safeguards)

A practical “how much can we send” estimate.

≈900 email attempts/month per inbox (30/day; follow-ups included)
Guidance-led (Mailshake commonly recommends ~100/day); Starter plan is capped (e.g., 1,500 sends/month)

Overage model

What happens when you need more.

Credits: $0.03
Inbox: $19/month
Add seats and/or upgrade tier

Trial and refunds

Risk if it’s not a fit.

7-day free trial
No free trial; no refunds

Deep feature comparison

If your goal is links, these differences matter more than sequence templates.

Which is the better fit?

BacklinkGPTBacklinkGPT

PIPELINE

Track to links

MailshakeMailshake

SEQUENCES

Sends + replies

Primary tracking unit

What the UI naturally pushes you to optimize.

BacklinkGPT

Links shipped + kept

Mailshake

Sends, opens, replies

Backlink verification/monitoring

Does it check that links actually go live and stay live?

BacklinkGPT

Mailshake

Deliverability safeguards

What prevents accidental oversending.

BacklinkGPT

Enforced: 30 email attempts/day per inbox (≈900/month; follow-ups included)

Mailshake

Warm-up + verification included; guidance-led daily caps (often ~100/day) + plan constraints

A/B testing

Split-testing focus.

BacklinkGPT

Not the core focus

Mailshake

Which is the better fit?

BacklinkGPTBacklinkGPT

PIPELINE

Track to links
MailshakeMailshake

SEQUENCES

Sends + replies

Primary tracking unit

What the UI naturally pushes you to optimize.

Links shipped + kept
Sends, opens, replies

Backlink verification/monitoring

Does it check that links actually go live and stay live?

Deliverability safeguards

What prevents accidental oversending.

Enforced: 30 email attempts/day per inbox (≈900/month; follow-ups included)
Warm-up + verification included; guidance-led daily caps (often ~100/day) + plan constraints

A/B testing

Split-testing focus.

Not the core focus

Pricing details that affect the real cost

Compare the limits, add-ons, and scaling rules—not only the starting price.

BacklinkGPT

Model

subscription = capacity (senders + daily agent pace); credits are a fair-use meter

Included

  • 2,000 / 6,000 / 20,000 prospect credits (fair-use, by plan)
  • 1 / 3 / 6 connected senders included
  • 7-day trial — the agent shows its work before you pay

Usage & add-ons

  • Extra credits: $0.03 (top-up pack or opt-in overage)
  • Extra sender: $19/month

Notes

  • One marginal price for credits everywhere — no overage arbitrage, no surprise bills.
  • Upgrades buy real throughput: more senders and a faster daily pace, not just bigger numbers.

Mailshake

Model

seat-based outreach (per user)

Included

  • Seat-based base feature access
  • Outbound templates and sequencing

Usage & add-ons

  • More seats
  • Tier upgrades

Notes

  • Trial/refund details vary by channel and offer.
  • Mailshake is strongest when replies and sequence management are the target KPI.

A practical switching plan

Move one workflow at a time, keep the outreach history you need, and test sender setup before scaling.

Steps

  1. 1

    Map your current outreach entry points

    Decide which lead sources and qualification filters move into BacklinkGPT before migration.

  2. 2

    Export active lists and outreach context

    Keep history for follow-up continuity but shift copy execution into the new workflow.

  3. 3

    Pilot with one campaign + one week window

    Run a short pilot to confirm inbox caps, reply rates, and link-tracking quality.

  4. 4

    Transition reporting and handoffs

    Define ownership of prospecting, link status, and outcome proof from day one.

Checklist

  • Inboxes per seat and whether you need dedicated mailboxes per account model.
  • Whether you still need third-party prospecting/monitoring after migration.
  • Team permissions and handoff ownership for follow-up workflows.

The question that matters most: who owns link-building judgment?

Mailshake can send and manage outreach well, but it is a general sales-engagement product. Your team still needs to source suitable pages, judge link quality, choose the right person, handle negotiations, and verify the final backlink. If those are the jobs you want software to take over, comparing email-sequence features misses the main difference.

Deliverability also remains your responsibility. Mailshake provides warm-up, verification, throttling, and inbox rotation, but no sending tool can rescue weak lists, poor authentication, or irrelevant copy. Its large G2 review footprint consistently praises ease of use and fast setup; reported drawbacks include occasional bugs, integration gaps, and an interface some users find dated.

Who is behind Mailshake?

Sujan Patel and Robert Senoff founded the company in 2015. It began as ContentMarketer.io before evolving into Mailshake, a broader sales-engagement platform. That history explains why it can support link outreach without being purpose-built around backlink qualification and retention.

Questions to ask before choosing

Quick answers to the points worth checking before you choose.

Sources

Last reviewed: 2026-07-23

  • Mailshake pricing

    https://mailshake.com/pricing/
  • Mailshake pricing explained

    https://docs.mailshake.com/article/56-pricing-explained
  • Mailshake refund policy

    https://docs.mailshake.com/article/53-whats-your-refund-policy
  • About Mailshake

    Founder and company background.

    https://mailshake.com/about/
  • Mailshake founder interview

    2015 launch and ContentMarketer.io origin.

    https://www.producthood.com/magazine-article/in-conversation-with-sujan-patel-co-founder-of-mailshake-voilanorbert/
  • Mailshake reviews on G2

    Large independent review sample and recurring buyer themes.

    https://www.g2.com/products/mailshake/reviews
On this pageTL;DR
TL;DRMailshake pricing, without the guessworkWorkflow: how teams use itPricing and billing semanticsThe question that matters most: who owns link-building judgment?Who is behind Mailshake?Questions to ask before choosingSources

On this page

TL;DRMailshake pricing, without the guessworkWorkflow: how teams use itPricing and billing semanticsThe question that matters most: who owns link-building judgment?Who is behind Mailshake?Questions to ask before choosingSources

Related Comparisons

Explore other head-to-head pages in this comparison cluster.

  • Respona logo

    BacklinkGPT vs Respona

    Best for teams choosing between outsourced placements and a template-led outreach app.

  • Pitchbox logo

    BacklinkGPT vs Pitchbox

    Best for teams managing many client campaigns with strict process and visibility requirements.

  • LinkDR logo

    BacklinkGPT vs LinkDR

    Best for teams that want to buy defined placement tiers instead of operating an owned outreach pipeline.

  • BuzzStream logo

    BacklinkGPT vs BuzzStream

    Best for agencies that need durable contact history and collaborative campaign workflows.

  • Adaptify logo

    BacklinkGPT vs Adaptify

    Best for agencies that want one white-label SEO delivery stack rather than a focused backlink outreach agent.

  • Backlinker AI logo

    BacklinkGPT vs Backlinker AI

    Best for businesses that want outsourced expert-quote pitches and a stated monthly backlink guarantee.

  • Linkee logo

    BacklinkGPT vs Linkee

    Best for SEO teams that want to operate their own campaigns inside a consolidated prospecting and outreach tool.

BacklinkGPT LogoBacklinkGPT

Your AI agent for backlinks. It hunts, drafts, and waits for your go.

Start 7-day trial

Content

  • The agent
  • How it works
  • Docs
  • Affiliate Program

Socials

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • TikTok
© 2026 FMD Labs GmbH
Disclaimer · Privacy · Terms